What the Papers say

tonypark wrote:

Nothing like leading by example..I see our very noble ( NOT) PM paid his brother £6 K for doing up the garden... xxxx They are All Thieving SCUM xxxx :evil:
The Best thing that could happen is a Mass protest by the public...Next Election..EVERYONE bouycot the vote..see them squirm then xxxxx :ohmy:

Ditto:lol:

It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonoured by your contempt of all virtue,and defiled by your practice of every vice;ye are a fractious crew and enemies to all good goverment;ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau to sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betry your God for a few pieces of money. Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you. Is there one vice you do not possess?
Ye have no more religion than my horse;gold is your God;which of you have not barter'd your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth? Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil'd this sacred place and turn'd the Lord's temple into a den of theives by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation;you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress'd, are yourselves gone! So take away that shining bauble there and lock up the doors.
In the name of God go!!

This is the famous speech to members of Parliment in 1653, which ordered Parliment to be dissolved.
I am sending a copy to good old Gordon:evil:<br><br>Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/18 16:33

weather ppl think the speaker micheal martin was good or bad at his job is beside the point ..for the house of parliment to blame him for them all puting there snouts in the troft is wrong and tipical of them.. for them to say he should have said to them all 'I think the expence sytem is wrong therefore I am going to change it' is absolute rubbish they are all to blame..they themselfs could have said no we are not doing this and we the MPS and lords want it changed

Baby Peter's mother got 10yrs for her evil crimes.But could be out in 5, due to time already served.
Her boyfriend got 12yrs for breaking the little boy's back.Plus life for raping another 2yr old tot.
The lodger got 3yrs for letting it go on without trying to get help.

If anybody has a gun I am willing to pull the trigger, but I will shoot the Judge first.
This little boy lost his life, doesn't anybody care anymore. :evil:

Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/22 18:32<br><br>Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/22 18:36

Dorrie wrote:

Baby Peter's mother got 10yrs for her evil crimes.But could be out in 5, due to time already served.
Her boyfriend got 12yrs for breaking the little boy's back.Plus life for raping another 2yr old tot.
The lodger got 3yrs for letting it go on without trying to get help.

If anybody has a gun I am willing to pull the trigger, but I will shoot the Judge first.
This little boy lost his life, doesn't anybody care anymore. :evil:

Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/22 18:32&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/22 18:36

the killing also should have been a life sentence ..in america they would have termed it two life sentences.. in other words untill they died

ellie wrote:

Dorrie wrote:

Baby Peter's mother got 10yrs for her evil crimes.But could be out in 5, due to time already served.
Her boyfriend got 12yrs for breaking the little boy's back.Plus life for raping another 2yr old tot.
The lodger got 3yrs for letting it go on without trying to get help.

If anybody has a gun I am willing to pull the trigger, but I will shoot the Judge first.
This little boy lost his life, doesn't anybody care anymore. :evil:

Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/22 18:32&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/22 18:36

the killing also should have been a life sentence ..in america they would have termed it two life sentences.. in other words untill they died

Totally agree, He could be out in 12yrs because of time already served,they could not be charged with killing Peter even though they recorded the torture on a mobile phone, this is now missing, so they cant prove murder, our legal system stinks, let's just hope someone gets them while they are in jail.

Dorrie wrote:

ellie wrote:

Dorrie wrote:

Baby Peter's mother got 10yrs for her evil crimes.But could be out in 5, due to time already served.
Her boyfriend got 12yrs for breaking the little boy's back.Plus life for raping another 2yr old tot.
The lodger got 3yrs for letting it go on without trying to get help.

If anybody has a gun I am willing to pull the trigger, but I will shoot the Judge first.
This little boy lost his life, doesn't anybody care anymore. :evil:

Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/22 18:32&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Post edited by: Dorrie, at: 2009/05/22 18:36

the killing also should have been a life sentence ..in america they would have termed it two life sentences.. in other words untill they died

Totally agree, He could be out in 12yrs because of time already served,they could not be charged with killing Peter even though they recorded the torture on a mobile phone, this is now missing, so they cant prove murder, our legal system stinks, let's just hope someone gets them while they are in jail.

well the poor wee mite did not kill himself they killed him I keep saying the laws should be sorted out..as they stand right now it is all on the side of the crimials and not the vicims

I see the Catholic Church is bringing disgrace on itself again, abuse in their childrens homes and Orphanages. They tended to sweep these things under the carpet, also send the offenders off on Retreat somewhere until it all died down, also it seemed more prevalent in Ireland. I know the offences were committed many years ago, however the victims still need to feel it has been dealt with!!!!!!!

as I have said before I was in a roman catholic orphanage and did not suffer any abuse, It was a happy time for me..it seems like the boys got the worst of things in all of the places they where placed in... no matter who ran it that includes remand schools and borstal

ellie wrote:

as I have said before I was in a roman catholic orphanage and did not suffer any abuse, It was a happy time for me..it seems like the boys got the worst of things in all of the places they where placed in... no matter who ran it that includes remand schools and borstal

I totally agree with that my friend, being a Catholic myself, I was taught by nuns,I had no complaints to make against them.

I see a Labour MP has been caught out with claiming £5 on his expenses ( paid by us) for money he put into church funds.......What a wonderful ironic connection.....Thieves and the Church....xxxx We will call that the parabel of ....The Thieving GIT xxxx

tonypark wrote:

I see a Labour MP has been caught out with claiming £5 on his expenses ( paid by us) for money he put into church funds.......What a wonderful ironic connection.....Thieves and the Church....xxxx We will call that the parabel of ....The Thieving GIT xxxx

every one of them claimed somthink from make up to moots and according to the papers they are putting in for as much as they can before the so called rules get changed
the three major parties have had a monopoly on what they can do in our name for yrs.. I have been saying for a long time that we need a few diffrent parties to come to the forfrront to stop them from being so arragant
sadly we could start to get that in a bad way but we the ppl kept letting them have the power even when there was not a hairs width diffents between their polices and never bothered to call them to acount ..they all sing from the same song sheet
no wonder the young and the old want a change
I know they claimed for exspences and that there where question marks about what they could claim for so I am guily as well for burying my head in the sand